Archive for May 7th, 2008

Boeing Takes Another Shot at Whistleblower, Gerald Eastman

ABC News Article about Gerald Eastman’s upcoming retrial as Boeing attempts again to seek retribution,  and some amusing reader comments.

 

http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2008/04/second-trial-fo.html

 

Enjoy


Add comment May 7, 2008

What Happens on a Whistleblower’s Website

From:  www.thelastinspector.com  (The pictures included on Mr. Eastman’s blog did not copy here.  Please visit his site to see the pictures that accompany the story.)

 

 

Case Setting Hearing Delayed Until Next Week Because the Senior Deputy Prosecutor Hurt Himself 

Wednesday, April 30, 2008, 11:11 AM

Updated: Today was to be the case setting hearing for the retrial of me on unfounded charges by Boeing’s King County Prosecutor.
However, the Senior Deputy Prosecutor, Scott Peterson, hurt himself over the weekend, so the county asked for a week’s delay, which my attorney and I did not object to. The hearing is now set for next week, Monday, May 5th.
Hopefully Senior Deputy Prosecutor Peterson didn’t hurt himself like he did last time–by committing a class B felony. I believe a class B felony is a much more serious a crime than the class C felony I am accused of.
Senior Deputy Prosecutor Peterson hurt himself last time (in 2004) just after he committed the class B felony of assault with a deadly weapon on a defenseless woman by ramming his car repeatedly into her while she was standing in a parking space. He hurt himself just after committing that crime against the defenseless woman when he “impacted” the forearm of the woman’s boyfriend who came to her aid and block tackling him to the ground.

So, hopefully the other innocent citizens around Senior Deputy Prosecutor Peterson when he hurt himself this time were not also being assaulted as the noted woman, Danatte Griffin, was, and they did not sustain any injuries.

To find out the character of the prosecutors I’m up against in this county you can view the news story by clicking this link:

http://www.kirotv.com/video/3532554/index.html?taf=sea

 

 

 


Here are some notable frames of the KIRO 7 Broadcast on the flagrant “caste based” bias in Seattle’s and King County’s prosecutions of the people who try to protect victims when their assaulters are powerful and/or rich:

 
 
 

 

KIRO 7 News Investigative Reporter Chris Halsne

 
 
 

 

Victim Danatte Griffin, whom King County Senior Deputy Prosector Scott Peterson Repeatedly assaulted with his vehicle.

 
 
 

 

King County Senior Deputy Prosector Scott Peterson, who repeatedly assaulted Ms. Griffin with his vehicle after he saw her in his way, standing between two vehicles that he wanted to wedge in between in order to park. Watch out non-elite of King County! If you thought a member of the elite wouldn’t hit you or run you over just to get to a parking space, you were wrong! And if you thought the member of the elite would get prosecuted for running you over intentionally while parking you would be dead wrong!

 
 
 

 

The weapon King County Senior Deputy Prosector Scott Peterson used to hit Ms. Griffin with repeatedly

 
 
 

 

The injuries King County Senior Deputy Prosector Scott Peterson inflicted on Ms. Griffin during his assault. If her boyfriend had abused her and left such nasty bruises he would have been jailed and prosecuted. However, a stranger to Ms. Griffin, King County Senior Deputy Prosector Scott Peterson, battered her intentionally with his vehicle, so his crime was never actually investigated, much less prosecuted. Mr. Peterson didn’t even spend a second in jail for this assault. However, her boyfriend, who tried to protect her from Mr. Peterson, was prosecuted for his “bumping into” such a powerful person as King County Senior Deputy Prosector Scott Peterson. Class warfare is only allowed one way in King County–The rich and powerful can do anything they want to do to the common citizen here, while the common citizen will be prosecuted for even trying to defend against such assaults.

This pretty much proves the opposite of justice that is in place in the King County Prosecutor’s office when the powerful assault an innocent citizen, or assault citizens trying to save many lives from being assaulted and/or killed by knowingly defective, largely uninspected and unapproved “vehicles” (commercial airplanes), as in my case.
When such citizens are assaulted by those perpetrators, the King County Prosecutor’s office doesn’t protect the victims of those crimes, whether they are innocent bystander citizens or whistleblowers trying to save lives placed at risk for greater profits–It instead prosecutes the victims or anyone coming to the aid of the victims, as in King County, the Prosecutor’s office seems to always purposefully ignore the vastly greater crimes of the powerful and/or wealthy, and instead prosecutes the victims of those criminal actors in order to maintain the powerful and/or wealthy perpetrator’s status, protecting them from accountability for their crimes by going on “offense” legally for those powerful interests by prosecuting the victims or anyone that comes to the victims aid on fabricated charges.
Don’t believe me? View the news story at the above link. Senior Deputy Prosecutor Peterson’s felonious actions were never actually investigated, much less prosecuted. However, the boyfriend protecting the one he loved was prosecuted for doing so.

In my case, I am being tried again on what the King County Prosecutor’s office knows (unless you believe their actions are driven by legal ignorance and incompetence, which I don’t) are false charges after the first attempt at convicting me on those false charges rightly failed. However I am not really the victim even though I’m being prosecuted on false charges. Just as the boyfriend was prosecuted for trying to protect his girlfriend from Mr. Peterson’s road rage attack with his car on a pedestrian, I am being prosecuted for trying to protect the flying public from fraud that has already cost people many injuries and/or their lives. The flying public is therefor the victim, in my case.

So which crime was greater? Senior Deputy Prosecutor Peterson getting angry at an innocent pedestrian and repeatedly hitting her with his car? Or the “crime” of the boyfriend pushing Deputy Prosecutor Peterson to the ground with his forearm in defense of his already injured girlfriend who was under attack by Mr. Peterson?

Or is the greater crime a King County Prosecutor’s office that ensures that victims or their protectors are always charged on fabricated charges when the wealthy and powerful assault them, especially if it is one of their own elite that is the perpetrator, and/or one of their campaign contributors?

You had better hope that King County Executive Ron Sims doesn’t come up to you on the sidewalk (if you are in King County and are out for a walk) and shoot you in cold blood, for if you survived, you’d be charged for spitting blood on the sidewalk and Sims would go free, unless the prosecutor’s office discriminates based on race as well as caste in its prosecutions. (Of course, this is a hypothetical example only, and as far as I know King County Executive Ron Sims is a model citizen who would never even think of doing such a thing, nor do I think he rests any easier with the knowledge that he might get away with any crime he wanted to commit with the King County Prosecutor’s office in its current biased against justice state.)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————–Reader Comments newest to oldest:

 ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

 

GFS 

Monday, May 5, 2008, 11:33 PM / http://whistleblowersupporter.typepad.com

Oh, by the way, Pete. Since you seem to be so ignorant. Are you one of those guys in Boeing that got into big trouble recently for committing acts of sexual harassment at the work place?
Since you seem so ignorant regarding your behavior, think about this. What you wrote to Mr. Eastman in your post’s last sentences, if one can call them that, is very blatant harassment, sexual harassment, in writing yet, and in a public place. I may even post this whole article and your blog comments in my public blog and group sites as well as it is such a good example of the problem. That would be about eight nationally read sites. Lots more people would get to see the types of attitudes and behaviors you are exemplifying.
Mr. Eastman now has good reason to haul you up on charges of sexual harassment, and sue you Pete. And it is all there clearly in writing in this very public place. I guess maybe you should worry about cleaning up your own act. If your employer, Boeing, sees it, it will probably necessitate the opening of an investigation on you. And if you actually hold a security clearance, it may not be for much longer. In case you don’t get it yet, your company does not like to be embarrassed publicly, so you really put your foot in it this time.
You just think this over a bit now.

 ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————–

 

 

GFS 

Monday, May 5, 2008, 11:09 PM / http://whistleblowersupporter.typepad.com

Interesting. Quite disgusting. I found that news story too and have been pondering the vast inequities of our local legal system.
So, Pete, what job to you hold in the Boeing Company. Your comments sound like sheepherding tactics for the company’s benefit. Take the plea deal? Why should a legitimate Whistleblower take a plea deal, even if there was one, from a company set on denying he is a legitimate whistleblower, and also determined to smear him and fraudulently represent him as a common criminal and convict of same? It makes no sense. Denying the existance of the whistleblower laws we do have, and the rights of due process and protections whistleblowers do have does not absolve the company of responsibility for their own”sins” and refusal to mediate them, which caused the whistleblower reports in the first place. Nor does it give them the ability to try to kill the messenger with impunity. Last time I checked, this is still America.
You Boeing employees, more often lawyers or managers, shouldn’t even bother to try to sway influence in blog sites. It is only too apparent where you are coming from and all the more pathetic.
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
 

 

Gerald Eastman 

Friday, May 2, 2008, 03:13 PM / www.thelastinspector.com

“Nothing to blow the whistle on”? You are the insane one if you were anywhere close to the QA or Manufacturing departments of Boeing and actually believe that. But because you were in both Monroe and Walla Walla prisons, I guess you must be at least criminally insane.

—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Pete 

Friday, May 2, 2008, 09:05 AM

Eastman either just does not get it, he is totally out of touch with reality, or he is a complete knothead! By antagonizing/bating both the Prosecutor’s office along with the Boeing Co. he is setting himself up for a very costly and painfully hard fall! Eastman’s best recourse it appears to me would be to have is lawyer negotiate a plea deal. Thus, he could minimize his sentence as well as choosing his place of incarceration.
If Eastman is stupid enough to roll the dice and proceed to trial a 2nd time all the while hiding behind this phony defense of being a whistleblower (especially when there was nothing to blow the whistle on) he is insane.
One thing Eastman should really consider very seriously is that both in Monroe and Walla Walla State Pens are convicts that love to make heavy-set inmates with “man-breast’s” their personnal Bitches!

 


Add comment May 7, 2008

Before the Era of Revolving Doors

 

Someone sent me this today to share with all of you.  –GFS

 

————————————————————————

 

Subject: HST: A Voice From The Past

When President Truman retired from office in 1952, his income was
 substantially a U.S. Army pension reported to have been $13,507.72 a year.
Congress, noting that he was paying for his stamps and personally licking
them, granted him an “allowance” and, later, a retroactive
 pension of $25,000 per year.

When offered corporate positions at large salaries, he declined, stati ng,
 “You don’t want me. You want the office of the president, and that doesn’t
belong to me. It belongs to the American people and it’s not for sale.”

 Even later, on May 6,1971, when Congress was preparing to award him the
Medal of Honor on his 87th birthday, he refused to accept it, writing, “I
don’t consider that I have done anything which should be the reason for any
award, Congressional or otherwise.”

We now see that some past presidents have found a new level of success in
 cashing in on the presidency, resulting in untold wealth. Today, many in
Congress also have found a way to become quite wealthy while enjoying the
fruits of their offices. Political offices are now for sale.

Was good old Harry Truman correct when he observed, “My choice early in

life was either to be a piano player in a whorehouse or a politician. And to
 tell the truth, there’s hardly any difference.

(I, for one, think that piano player more honorable than our current
politicians.)

-Whistleblower Blogs Reader


Add comment May 7, 2008

FBI Raids U.S. Office of Special Counsel

OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL RAIDED BY FBI
Agency Head and Staff Suspected of Obstructing Justice


Washington, DC — In a notably ironic turn of events, FBI agents raided the office of Special Counsel Scott Bloch this morning, seizing computers and documents as part of an ongoing obstruction of justice investigation. Bloch, who is charged with protecting federal whistleblowers, has been under investigation for, among other things, whistleblower retaliation within his own agency.

Marshall Chriswell, Communications Director of the National Whistleblower Center issued the following statements on this issue:

“It is shocking that the individual who is primarily responsible for investigating federal whistleblower complaints would be the target of an investigation in which he and his staff are suspected of obstructing justice.”

“The Bush administration must take whistleblower protection seriously, relieve Mr. Bloch of his position, and appoint a Special Counsel who possesses the necessary qualifications and integrity to do the job right.”

 

-end-

————————————————————————————————————- 

Since 1988 the NWC has championed whistleblower protection. The NWC is currently supporting FBI Whistleblower Bassem Youssef, who has reported serious misconduct in the War on Terror, and the NWC is currently assisting Bunnatine Greenhouse (the former Army Corps of Engineers top contracting officer who opposed the no-bid multi billion dollar contracts awarded to Halliburton for the reconstruction of Iraq)

For more information, please visit www.whistleblowers.org and www.whistleblowersblog.org.

 

 

 

FBI Agents Raid Office of Special Counsel

 

OSC Employees’ Attorney Sends Letter to the White House

 

 

The Wall Street Journal has reported that “more than a dozen” FBI agents served grand jury subpoenas this morning while searching the U.S. Office of Special Counsel and the home of Special Counsel Scott Bloch. According to the Journal, OSC employees say the raid is in connection with allegations of obstruction of justice by Bloch, who in 2006 used a computer service, Geeks on Call, to completely erase his work computer’s hard drive. 

 

Bloch asked the company to eradicate his computer’s files as he was being investigated by the Office of Personnel Management Inspector General in connection with a complaint submitted by a group of anonymous OSC employees, GAP, the Project On Government Oversight, and Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility.

Last week, attorney Debra Katz, who represents the groups and the anonymous OSC employees, sent a comprehensive summary of Bloch’s abuses during his tenure to President Bush, and called on the President to use his authority to remove the Special Counsel “for cause.”

 

 

To Read the Summary Letter

 

>>>  Click Here  <<<

 

 

http://whistleblower.org/template/index.cfm

 

FBI Agents Raid the Office & Home

of Special Counsel Scott Bloch!

 

 

 

 

 

By JOHN R. WILKE

 

May 6, 2008    3:10 p.m.

WASHINGTON — Federal Bureau of Investigation agents raided the Office of Special Counsel here, seizing computers and documents belonging to the agency chief Scott Bloch and staff.

More than a dozen FBI agents served grand jury subpoenas shortly after 10 a.m., shutting down the agency’s computer network and searching its offices, as well as Mr. Bloch’s home. Employees said the searches appeared focused on alleged obstruction of justice by Mr. Bloch during the course of an 2006 inquiry into his conduct in office.

 

The independent agency, created by Congress in the wake of the Watergate scandal, is charged with protecting federal employees and deciding whether their complaints merit full-scale investigation — a first line of defense against fraud and mismanagement in government. It also enforces a ban on U.S. employees engaging in partisan political activity.

The Wall Street Journal reported last year that Mr. Bloch had used “Geeks on Call,” an outside computer-service firm, to erase his computer and those of two former staff members in December 2006. (See related article)

Mr. Bloch’s agency is typically involved in sensitive investigations of alleged government wrongdoing. Before the departure of White House political director Karl Rove, Mr. Bloch’s staff was looking into whether he or other White House officials improperly used federal agencies to help re-elect Republicans in 2006.

At the same time, Mr. Bloch has been under investigation himself since 2005. At the direction of the White House, the federal Office of Personnel Management’s inspector general is looking into claims that Mr. Bloch abused his investigative authority, improperly retaliated against employees or dismissed whistleblower cases without adequate examination.

The computer erasures became part of that investigation and are one of the reasons behind today’s raid, employees said. Investigators were trying to determine whether the deletions were improper or part of a cover-up, the Journal article reported.

Bypassing his agency’s computer technicians, Mr. Bloch phoned 1-800-905-GEEKS, the mobile PC-help service. It dispatched a technician in one of its signature PT Cruiser wagons. In the Journal story, Mr. Bloch confirmed that he contacted Geeks on Call but said he was trying to eradicate a virus that had seized control of his computer. He said the erasures didn’t delete any files related to the inquiry.

Mr. Bloch was in the office this morning during the raid but couldn’t be reached for comment. The search was still under way early this afternoon, witnesses said.  

 

 

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121009238217171025.html?mod=googlenews_wsj


2 comments May 7, 2008


Calendar

May 2008
M T W T F S S
« Apr   Jun »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

Posts by Month

Posts by Category