Archive for August 19, 2008


So, what really is important?  Honesty, Affiliation, Power, Wealth, Marital Fidelity, Lying?

I heard someone on the radio talking about the recent outing of John Edwards alleged affair and heard the host adamantly saying that the point was not the infidelity, but the lie.  (Sound familiar?) 

 

But is it?  Reflect back on all the lies.  Look over even this site and see how many instances of corruption and fraud, and lying have occurred, sometimes outed by whistleblowers, sometimes found by reporters or others.  Lies, cover-ups based on fraud, theft, manipulation of situations generally to satisfy the greed of someone or a group of someone’s, perhaps even a company, seem to be the norm now days.  Why?  Some of it I’m sure is political positioning and strategy.  I envision Karl Rove’s long lists of things he’s got on nearly everyone.  Juicy little factoids ready to be used to sway or if that fails, destroy the opposition to his employers and long time conspirators. Usually this thought waves through as I am again wondering why Congress won’t stand up and do something about all of this crap and corruption, because with the neutering and corrupting of the Justice Dept. and the intentional perverting of not only the interpretation of our Constitution by the Executive Branch and their associates, but the strong armed control of nearly every government agency by Presidentially appointed socially and politically prejudiced directors at the top, Congress, as dysfunctional as it is, and as fraught with corrupted people as it may be, is at this time kind of the last stop. 

 

It seems to me that the rest of our government has given up and has crawled into the kitchen cupboard whimpering, waiting for the smoke from the destruction to bring an end to its suffering.  And while all of this is going on the fear mongering aimed at the public also goes on, and the destruction of quality of people’s lives in every possible way continues. 

 

So, in the interest of finding a path through all of the stuff that is coming out, is one kind of lie worse than another?  Should someone be drawn and quartered who lied about marital fidelity, but someone who lied about whether information or required testimony was about national security, or someone who lied about information used to back up certain kind of political or legal actions be allowed to continue with impunity?  This seems to be something all of us, the public need to clarify for ourselves.  Justice is supposed to be blind, but fair and be applied with integrity.

I post this here for your consideration.  Think about the issue, of character, not restricted specifically these particular players.  Perhaps you can contribute other examples of note.    What can be done about all of this?  It seems like the citizens really do need to play a large role in stopping the flood.  Influence and lead how you can.  -GFS

 *************************************************************************************************

From NPR via Huffington Press

Cindy McCain’s Half Sister ‘Angry’ She’s Hidden

Listen Now [4 min 16 sec] add to playlist

 

Enlarge

 

Ted Robbins/NPR

Kathleen Hensley Portalski displays newspaper clippings of her father in World War II, as well as snapshots of herself as a child with her father.

 

 

 

Enlarge

 

Courtesy Nicholas Portalski

Portalski is shown with her late father, Jim Hensley, who also was Cindy McCain’s father.

 

 

 

Read the original profile on Cindy McCain.

 

 

 

Enlarge

 

Ted Robbins/NPR

Nicholas Portalski, whose mother is McCain’s half sister, says it’s “very, very hurtful” that he and his mother haven’t been recognized.

 

 

All Things Considered, August 18, 2008 · Last Tuesday, NPR broadcast a story about Cindy McCain‘s business and charity work. In it, Ted Robbins described McCain as the only child of Jim Hensley, a wealthy Arizona businessman. The next morning, NPR received an e-mail from Nicholas Portalski of Phoenix, who heard the story with his mother.

“We were listening to the piece about Cindy McCain on NPR, All Things Considered, and it just struck us very hard,” Portalski said.

His mother, Kathleen Hensley Portalski, is also Hensley’s daughter.

The Portalski family is accustomed to hearing Cindy McCain described as Hensley’s only child.

She’s been described that way by news organizations from The New Yorker and The New York Times to Newsweek and ABC.

McCain herself routinely uses the phrase “only child,” as she did on CNN last month. “I grew up with my dad,” she said then. “I’m an only child. My father was a cowboy, and he really loved me very much, but I think he wanted a son occasionally.”

McCain’s father was also a businessman — and twice a father.

“I’m upset,” Kathleen Portalski says. “I’m angry. It makes me feel like a nonperson, kind of.”

Who Is Kathleen Hensley Portalski?

Documents show Kathleen Anne Hensley was born to Jim and Mary Jeanne Hensley on Feb. 23, 1943. They had been married for six years when Kathleen was born.

Jim Hensley was a bombardier on a B-17, flying over Europe during World War II.

He was injured and sent to a facility in West Virginia to recuperate. During that time, while still married to Mary Jeanne, Hensley met another woman — Marguerite Smith. Jim divorced Mary Jeanne and married Marguerite in 1945.

Cindy Lou Hensley was born nine years later, in 1954.

She may have grown up as an only child, but so did her half sister, Kathleen, who was raised by a single parent.

Portalski says she did see her father and her half sister from time to time.

“I saw him a few times a year,” she says. “I saw him at Christmas and birthdays, and he provided money for school clothes, and he called occasionally.”

Jim Hensley also provided credit cards and college tuition for his grandchildren, as well as $10,000 gifts to Kathleen and her husband, Stanley Portalski. That lasted a decade, they say. By then, Jim Hensley had built Hensley and Co. into one of the largest beer distributorships in the country. He was worth tens, if not hundreds, of millions of dollars.

Sole Inheritor To Hensley’s Estate

When Hensley died in 2000, his will named not only Portalski but also a daughter of his wife Marguerite from her earlier marriage. So, Cindy McCain may be the only product of Jim and Marguerite’s marriage, but she is not the only child of either.

She was, however, the sole inheritor of his considerable estate.

Kathleen Portalski was left $10,000, and her children were left nothing. It’s a fact Nicholas Portalski says his sister discovered the hard way.

“What she found in town — on the day of or the day before or the day after his funeral — was that the credit card didn’t work anymore,” Nick says.

The Portalskis live in a modest home in central Phoenix. Kathleen is retired, as is her husband. Nicholas Portalski is a firefighter and emergency medical technician looking for work.

They say it would have been nice if they were left some of the Hensley fortune.

They also say they are Democrats, but Nicholas Portalski says he had another reason for coming forward.

“The fact that we don’t exist,” he says. “The fact that we’ve never been recognized, and then Cindy has to put such a fine point on it by saying something that’s not true. Recently, again and again. It’s just very, very hurtful.”

Kathleen Portalski says she’d like an acknowledgment and an apology.

NPR asked the McCain campaign — specifically, Cindy McCain — to comment or respond. Neither replied.

 

Related NPR Stories

  • Aug. 13, 2008

Cindy McCain: Private Heiress And Philanthropist

  • July 9, 2008

First Ladies Pursue Women Voters

  • June 27, 2008

From NPR via Huffington Press

 

Original Profile for John McCain’s Wife: 

Cindy McCain: Private Heiress And Philanthropist

Listen Now [6 min 22 sec] add to playlist

Correction: The story said Cindy McCain’s father, Jim Hensley, left his company to “his only child.” In fact, Hensley was also survived by a daughter from a previous marriage, Kathleen Anne Hensley Portalski.

 

See A Slideshow Of Cindy McCain

 

 

 

 

Enlarge

 

Mary Altaffer

Cindy McCain arrives at her husband’s campaign headquarters in Washington, D.C., on Aug. 2. AP

 

 

 

Enlarge

 

Timothy A. Clary

After wrapping up the GOP nomination fight, Sen. John McCain and wife Cindy McCain thank supporters in Dallas. AFP/Getty Images

 

 

 

Read the companion profile on Michelle Obama, the wife of Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama.

 

 

 

Enlarge

 

Hoang Dinh Nam

Cindy McCain meets with 11-year-old Le Thi Phuoc and her father, Le Van, in Vietnam in June. McCain helped arrange for Phuoc to get surgery in the U.S. for her cleft palate. AFP/Getty Images

 

 

All Things Considered, August 13, 2008 · As the wife of Republican presidential hopeful Sen. John McCain, Cindy McCain has a high public profile and she’s often at her husband’s side.

But she is also heiress to the Hensley and Co. beer distributorship in Phoenix. And when it comes to the family business, Cindy McCain resolutely refuses to comment.

“I don’t think I’m very mysterious,” she said on ABC’s Good Morning America. “I’m not the candidate. I’ve never been front and center. I do the things I enjoy and that are important to me. And [I] do them in the way I like to do them.”

Hensley and its board’s chairman, Cindy McCain, declined to participate in this story. The company, which distributes brands including Bud Light and Budweiser, has a 60 percent share of the Phoenix market and had $370 million in revenues last year.

McCain’s father, Jim Hensley, founded the beer business in 1955. He built it into the third-largest Anheuser-Busch distributorship in the country. When he died in 2000, he left it to his only child.

The Private Prenuptial

Cindy Hensley met John McCain more than 20 years earlier at a party in Hawaii. He was a 43-year-old naval officer, married at the time. She was 25. They married a year later — in 1980 — and they signed a prenuptial agreement, which was fairly rare at the time.

The agreement has never been made public, but tax attorney Lee Sheppard, who writes for the nonpartisan publication Tax Notes, says there could only have been one reason for the prenup: Cindy had money and John didn’t.

“She was an heiress … who was marrying, and she was very young at the time,” Sheppard says. McCain was “an old military guy who didn’t have a job and went to work for the father-in-law right after they got married.”

John McCain’s job with Hensley didn’t last long. In 1982, he ran for Congress, financing his campaign partially with loans from Cindy. After he won, Cindy McCain went with him to Washington, D.C. She left two years later because she was homesick for Arizona.

Separate Tax Returns For Privacy

The McCains have always filed separate tax returns. That was a problem earlier this year, when Cindy McCain refused to release her return.

“This is a privacy issue. My husband is the candidate,” Cindy McCain told NBC’s Ann Curry. “I’m not the candidate.”

Eventually, she released a partial 2006 return. It lists income from salaries as just under $300,000. And it lists income from businesses, real estate holdings and trusts at $4.5 million — with no other details.

This year, McCain has benefited from holding stock in Anheuser-Busch, which is being acquired by Belgian brewer InBev. Her family also owns a stake in the Arizona Diamondbacks baseball team.

Congressional financial disclosure forms list the McCains’ assets together, making John McCain the third-richest member of the Senate. But Sheppard says Congress devised the forms so they don’t offer much detail, either.

“The federal financial disclosure [form] says things like, well, are you worth somewhere between $1 million and $100 million?” she says. “In her case, it doesn’t tell us much, because family businesses don’t have to be valued, and Hensley is a family business.”

Sheppard says that despite Cindy McCain’s privacy protest, businesses have interests that ought to be scrutinized.

“Let’s go back in time,” Sheppard says. “Lyndon Johnson was married to a very rich woman in the broadcasting business. Well, that has a little bit of political effect. And that is a business with a lot of political interests. And beer is a business with a lot of political interests, too. Beer is affected by all kinds of legal questions.”

Hensley and company executives have lobbied the federal government on a number of issues, including successfully opposing rules to put alcohol content on beer labels.

When he was chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, John McCain recused himself from alcohol-related issues. If he’s elected president, recusal will not be an option. The campaign says McCain will deal with that if he’s elected.

A Passion For Philanthropy

Cindy McCain is Hensley’s chairman, and she’s not involved in day-to-day operations. Those who know her say what she truly enjoys is philanthropic work.

She had her own charity providing emergency medical care to children, but it disbanded in the mid ’90s after McCain admitted she illegally obtained painkillers from that charity for a back problem. Now, she is active in three charities.

As recently as this spring, she traveled to Vietnam with Operation Smile, a charity that provides surgery for children with facial deformities.

“Cindy always scrubs and goes into the operating room,” says Vonnie Wray, the organization’s development director. “She’s very, very hands on with comforting the parents who are anxious — and perhaps shows them pictures of her own daughter.”

The McCains adopted a child with a cleft palate, Bridget, who is now 16.

Through much of the 1990s, Cindy McCain stayed out of the public eye, raising four children at home. Now, as when her husband first ran for president in 2000, Cindy McCain is at his side. She supports his career — and doesn’t reveal too much about her own.

 

Related NPR Stories

  • Aug. 12, 2008

Michelle Obama: The Exec, Mom And Campaigner

  • July 9, 2008

First Ladies Pursue Women Voters

  • June 27, 2008

Candidate’s Wives Put Under the Microscope

  • June 17, 2008

Wives of McCain, Obama: Hurting or Helping?

Corruption and lack of ethics are draining this country.  -GFS

 

******************************************************************

Link to original at Washington Post:  http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/17/AR2008071702760_pf.html

 

 

Bids for Work Falsified, GAO Reports
$100 Million in Contracts for Distressed Zones Go to Firms Operating Elsewhere

By Anita Huslin
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, July 18, 2008; D04

Over the past two years, at least 10 Washington area companies have won more than $100 million in prime government contracts set aside for small businesses in economically distressed areas by claiming they had residency in those communities.

A Government Accountability Office report released yesterday challenged those claims and said the agency plans to ask the Small Business Administration‘s inspector general to investigate.

The GAO said it reviewed records for 17 Washington area companies participating in the program and found that 10 allegedly failed to meet SBA requirements that their primary offices be based in an economically distressed zone and that at least 35 percent of their employees live in one.

In one instance, a roofing contractor with a $4.1 million Air Force contract listed his business as being in a Landover distressed zone. When government investigators visited, the office was in half of a duplex and a person who identified himself as a vice president said no employees worked there. According to payroll records, only 12 percent of the company’s employees lived in the zone, the GAO said.

In another, an engineering company listed its primary address as the second floor of a house in Northeast Washington that had been converted into a dentist’s office, but its Web site locates the company in McLean and employees answer the phone there. Audrey Price, president of the company, Quantum Dynamics, said she has an open-ended arrangement with the dentist for the space above his office. Her company is planning to move soon from McLean to Macon, Ga.

“We are preparing a complete response to the SBA and expect to be exonerated as far what the GAO is saying,” she said by telephone.

In another case, investigators went to the address of CSI Engineering (DC/PC) in Greenbelt and found the office locked and several days of mail piled outside the door. The company president said he has two companies with similar names; one is in Greenbelt and another in Beltsville, which is not in an economically distressed zone.

“We do all of the engineering in Greenbelt every day,” said CSI Engineering president Dave Ghosal, who works in Beltsville. “There’s a lot of turnover in people, but if you call, there are people there” in Greenbelt. “The names, I think, are a little confusing.”

The GAO discussed its findings yesterday during a hearing before the House Committee on Small Business. The report found fault with the SBA’s oversight.

As a test of the program’s screening process, investigators created fictitious companies and submitted applications for the Historically Underutilized Business Zone program. Four of them won certification, even though one listed a Starbucks as its company address and the employee and company information was fabricated on all the applications, GAO investigators told committee members.

“We created the bogus companies to test fraud controls, the gateway to the money,” said Gregory Kutz, managing director of forensic audits and special investigations for the GAO. “That miserably failed.”

The GAO said the program relies on limited documentation and there is little follow-up by the SBA. As a result, some companies rent space in a HUB zone to win certification, but then move elsewhere, investigators said.

After the hearing, SBA officials released a statement outlining steps they will take to correct problems and said they have already moved to rectify problems such as program maps that incorrectly designate HUB zones. Bad maps have resulted in ineligible small businesses participating in the program and in eligible businesses being blocked out, the GAO report said.

SBA officials said they would work on their internal systems to improve the verification process. Last year, administration officials quashed legislation that would have required on-site visits of applicants and other measures to ensure businesses’ eligibility, calling them “burdensome or undesirable.”

Under federal contracting rules, agencies are to award 3 percent of their annual contracts to qualified companies in HUB zones. In 2003 to 2006, the percentage of prime contracting dollars fell about 33 percent short of the statutory goal in 2006, according to the GAO.